Drunk Drivers - A New Approach

If Drunk Drivers Were Treated like Sex Offenders 

Nobody likes sex offenders. People aren't very fond of drunk drivers, either. Drunk drivers have a much higher recidivism rate than sex offenders, and are much more likely to kill or injure someone than sex offenders. 

So let us imagine, for a moment, that they are given similar treatment.

2003
You are caught running a red light. The policeman who pulls you over discovers you  been drinking, and arrests you for drunk driving. The judge sentences you to a $1000 fine and 60 days in jail. Recognizing your drinking problem, you participate in a voluntary alcohol treatment program, join AA, get sober, and never drink again, let alone drink and drive.


2005
Drunk driving tragedies have been in the news a lot over the past year, and the public wants to toughen up on drunk drivers. A law is passed requiring anyone convicted of drunk driving after the year 2000 to be put on a non-public registry for five years from the date of their conviction. The registry exists so if there are any hit-and-run accidents, the police know who to check out as suspects first. You are now required to report to the police station once a year to give them your address, driver  license number, license plate numbers, and vehicle descriptions. You must report any changes in information within 5 days. If you fail to report, you can expect 2 years of incarceration on a felony charge.  Thank goodness you only have to do this for two more years!

2007
As a reaction to an especially messy drunk driving incident that got many people up in arms, everyone convicted of drunk driving after the year 2000 is restricted from living within 1000 feet of the nearest bar or store which sells alcoholic beverages. Your state legislature also decides that its RDDs (registered drunk drivers) will need to be on the police registry for ten years from the date of their conviction. This takes a big bite out of the state budget, so RDDs are expected to pay $500 per year to offset the cost. Your house is within range of two liquor stores. You have to move far out of town, forcing you and your wife to find new jobs. It's a scramble and Santa isn't as generous this year. Your children, who had to change schools mid-year, are not happy. Now you are stuck on
that registry until 2013!

Early 2008
The national government has imposed a minimum of 2 years in prison for any drunk-driving charge, and a maximum of 10 years if there has been damage to property or personal injury. Failure to register now carries a stiffer penalty of 5 years in prison, with no parole in either situation. RDDs originally convicted of personal injury incidents must now re-register four times a year, at a cost of $250 per visit. Failure to register carries the same penalty as a new offense. Your family celebrates the fact that this time, the changes do not affect you. 

Mid-2008
Thanks to politicians who all want to look tough on Drunk Drivers, living restrictions are expanded to include any place where people congregate to drink. All RDD-owned vehicles must have pink license plates so others will know that a possibly drunk driver is behind the
wheel. Another federal law forbids any current RDD from owning certain types of vehicles. No studies have actually confirmed this, but it is believed that people who own these vehicles are more likely to drive while intoxicated.

You own one of these restricted vehicles. You are allowed a month to sell it or face a felony charge and two years  incarceration. You lose a lot of money in the process, and can only afford to buy a clunker. You also have to move again, because there is a Kiwanis Club just over the hill. The only place that qualifies is a run-down trailer park filled with other RDD's (registered drunk drivers). Your kids and wife are frequently harassed by schoolmates and neighbors whenever they drive anywhere, and the car is often vandalized.  The kids are regularly getting into fights at school, and your oldest shows signs of serious depression.

Early 2009
Two studies have shown Drunk Driving accounted for nearly 260 child deaths each year, and 700 serious child injuries. The federal government, in an effort to protect these poor children, passes the Cindy Sweet Act, named after a child who became a paraplegic after one such incident, which mandates that all states create a public, web-based registry listing ANYONE who has had ANY type of alcohol-related conviction since the year 2000. This registry includes the RDD's home and work addresses, his/her photograph, description of his/her vehicle and of course the vehicle license plate numbers that have been convicted of personal injury charges must install breathalyzers, at their cost, into each vehicle they drive, that send radio reports back to their local police station for monitoring. A positive breathalyzer is grounds for immediate arrest. You lose your job, because your employer refuses to be listed on the registry, and nobody else will hire you in spite of your excellent employment history. The road to the trailer park is lined with signs like Baby Killers and Beware! Child Murderers!  Others are much cruder. Your eldest tries to commit suicide, and is placed in a treatment center. Unable to take any more of this, your spouse packs up the younger kids and moves out, with your blessing. You move into a two-bedroom trailer with five other RDDs, to conserve what little money you manage to earn from odd jobs.  Interestingly, not one of your trailor-mates have ever driven drunk. But they all get the same treatment.


2010
Penalties for new offenses, and for failing to register, have doubled. RDDs are no longer allowed to drive on the interstate, for public safety reasons. The breathalyzer-and-license-plate requirements are expanded to include any vehicles owned by family members, because the RDD might have access to them. Also, all these vehicles must have a GPS installed for law enforcement to track whether it is safely parked in your driveway or parking lot between 6 p.m. and 5 a.m., since those are the hours most bars are open.
The new requirements have caused you and most of your trailer-mates to lose what little income you make, because you had night jobs. In desperation, everyone chips in to buy two bottles of good rum the first drink any of you have had since your convictions. Passing around the bottles, you all get roaring drunk, climb into your breathalyzer-enhanced vehicles, turn on the engines, and wait. Within minutes, police arrive and take all of you into custody. You are guaranteed to be in prison for five years or more. But at least you
are warm, and dry, and have steady jobs.

Maine Supreme Court Listens to Thirteen Mainers Seeking Removal from Sex Offender Registry

by WABI-TV5 News Desk - September 14th 2012 06:02pm - Read more Regional News

Maine's highest court listened to arguments yesterday seeking to remove certain names from Maine's sex offender registry.

Attorney Jim Mitchell represents thirteen people on the list who served their sentenced before the registry was created in 1999.

Maine's Supreme Court also heard from Deputy Attorney General Paul Stern yesterday.

He says it's important to keep the names on the list because it's not fair to guardians who might be moving next door or working with someone who could still be a danger to their children, but Mitchell says the convicted sex offenders he represents are being punished retroactively.

"If something wasn't criminal when you did it, you can't come back a year later and say 'Now we're making it criminal, so we're gonna prosecute you.' No we don't treat people that way."

"There's no reason to believe somebody who was convicted of a serious sex offense or multiple sex offenses in the 1980s is any more safe than someone who was convicted of a sex offense today."

Mitchell says there's a chance this matter could go back to trial again, but he's hoping the court will make a decision.

http://www.wabi.tv/news/33416/maine-supreme-court-listens-to-thirteen-mainers-seeking-removal-from-sex-offender-registry

Study: Program For Sex Offenders Is Reducing Crime

MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) - Sex offenders who are enrolled in a new mentoring program through the Department of Corrections are 84 percent less likely to return to prison, according to a new study.
Minnesota Circles of Support and Accountability started in 2008, working with level 2 sex offenders who have a moderate risk of re-offending.

Each offender about to be released from prison is matched with a group of four to seven volunteer mentors, in an effort to prevent new crimes. Volunteers in the program receive training and support from the Department of Corrections.

They work with offenders to help them find jobs, housing, treatment and other resources as they return to their communities.

The program relies on volunteers, which saves money for taxpayers, according to a press release.
Officials say every dollar that’s spent on the program is estimated to have a return savings of $1.82.

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2012/09/12/study-new-program-for-sex-offenders-reduces-crimes/

Why the North Carolina Sex Offender Registry Doesn’t Work

Why the North Carolina Sex Offender Registry Doesn’t Work

In 2006, the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act came into law, which birthed a national registry for sex offenders. Convicted sexual offenders were organized into three tiers, depending on the severity of their offenses. After release from prison, offenders would be obligated to report their residence address at specific intervals. This information was shared with state governments, so that law enforcement officials could monitor parolees and ex-convicts. Neighbors could be warned if a sex offender lived nearby.

The idea behind the law was straightforward: sex offenders often commit similar crimes. By keeping track of these offenders, police could prevent future crimes.

Six years later, the results are in: the program doesn’t work.

See the rest here :Why the North Carolina Sex Offender Registry Doesn’t Work